Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (66561)	6/10/2009 11:58:08 AM
From: jlallen	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224705

Its all Obama now....Bush is history. And he's making a total mess of it....

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (66561)	6/10/2009 12:02:24 PM
From: DizzyG	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224705

But wait, there is more, Kenneth... Obama's Vulnerability A Commentary By Dick Morris Wednesday, June 10, 2009 At last there is convincing evidence that Obama’s poll numbers may be descending to earth. While his approval remains high – and his personal favorability is even higher – the underlying numbers suggest that a decline may be in the offing. Even as he stands on his pedestal, the issue numbers under his feet are crumbling. According to the Rasmussen Poll, more voters now trust Republicans than Democrats to handle the economy by a margin of 45-39. Scott Rasmussen notes that “this is the first time in over two years of polling that the GOP has held the advantage on this issue.” Last month, he had the Democrats holding a one point lead, but they lost it in June’s polling. And the Democratic leads over Republicans on their core issues are also dropping. Particularly interesting is the Democratic decline over health care from an 18 point lead in May to only ten points now. The Gallup Poll also confirms that the president’s personal ratings are high but the underlying data less so. While 67% of voters give Obama personal favorable ratings and 61% approve of his job performance (Rasmussen has his job approval lower, at 55%), they give him much lower ratings on specific issues. Gallup shows Obama getting only 55% approval on handling of the economy (down from 59% in February) and found that only 45% approve of his handling of federal spending while 46% approve of his treatment of the budget deficit. As it becomes clearer that the deficit caused by spending has landed us in a new economic crisis, entirely of Obama’s own making, his popularity and job performance are likely to drop as well. The old recession – that the public says was caused by Bush – shows signs of winding down. But the new recession and/or inflation – triggered by Obama’s massive deficits – is just now coming upon us. If Obama refuses to cut back on his spending/stimulus plans (despite convincing evidence that Americans are not spending the money), he has three options: a) He can raise taxes which will trigger a deeper recession; b) He can print money which will trigger huge inflation; c) He can pay more interest to borrow money which will send the economy diving down again. The blame for these outcomes will fall squarely on Obama’s deficit and spending policies. The fact that Americans are aware of these issues, and already disapprove of Obama’s performance on them, indicate that they will be increasingly receptive to blaming him for the “new” recession. Interestingly, Obama’s polling is now the exact opposite of Clinton’s in the days after Monica. Back then, the president’s approval for handling specific issues was his forte while his job approval remained high but his personal favorability lagged twenty points behind. Ultimately, it is a politician’s performance on specific issues that determines his electability. Personal favorability withers in the face of issue differences. Obama is about to find out that you cannot rely on image to bolster your presidency when the underlying issues are crumbling. All this data suggests that Obama might run out of steam just as he gets to his health care agenda. As unemployment mounts, month after month, and Obama’s claims of job creation (or savings) ring hollow, it is possible that he will not have the heft to pass his radical restructuring of the health care system. The automaton Democratic majority may pass it anyway, but it will be a one-way ticket to oblivion if they do. COPYRIGHT EILEEN MCGANN AND DICK MORRIS 2009. rasmussenreports.com LOL! Diz-

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (66561)	6/10/2009 12:04:53 PM
From: DizzyG	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224705

Pay attention, Kenneth... This was the most profound part of the article: The old recession – that the public says was caused by Bush – shows signs of winding down. But the new recession and/or inflation – triggered by Obama’s massive deficits – is just now coming upon us. rasmussenreports.com The new Obama recession is upon us and he is responsible. Or didn't you get that memo yet? You are such a DNC parrot. LOL! Diz-

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (66561)	6/10/2009 3:04:15 PM
From: TimF	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224705

The Bush administration proposed TARP, but the bailouts where extended by Obama, who's also pushed through, or is proposing a lot of additional spending, including spending in 2009. Yes the initial 2009 budget proposal was from Bush, but that proposal wasn't followed, there was a lot of additional spending, so even the 2009 deficit is largely an Obama+the current congress thing, and the future deficits will all be on them. Even if you drop 2009 from consideration look at the CBO projections for 2010 to 2019. All those deficits are much larger than any while Bush was president.