SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (486922)6/10/2009 5:25:55 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1572369
 
Do you think sex has anything to do with sexuality?

Yes, but its not a requirement.....rather, its a manifestation of one's sexuality but it doesn't need to be expressed to have a sexuality.


Sex is sexuality manifested then is what you're getting at. Word playing. At least you're admitting sex and sexuality are linked.

what's you point?

Seeing whether you'll admit anything people do sexually is weird or deviant. You're playing a lot of word games to avoid that.

S&M is a form of gratification that can be sexual or non sexual. Its not considered sexuality.

???? Now you're saying this has nothing to do with sexuality? Sheesh.

Which gets back to what you're willing to admit is deviant. If homosex isn't deviant, is S&M, bestiality, etc?

I don't know about S&M.....it seems to be quite common. On the other hand, I believe bestiality is fairly rare so I suspect that would be classified as deviant behavior. I am not an authority on sexual issues.


In claiming S&M has nothing to do with sexuality, you're getting pretty convincing about that last sentence. Basically, I think its fair to say that liberal fashion is your guide to what is deviant ... if liberals say its normal, its normal, otherwise maybe it isn't.

Did you know there's a term for bestiality now? Zoosexuality:

en.wikipedia.org

It turns out anti-bestiality laws are grounded in religious values. Which means liberals probably think they s/b unconstitutional. Liberals could easily decide that zoosexuality is fashionable in a few years.

Common reasons given for laws
In cultures with a strong background in Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), personal or cultural beliefs about God's Biblical laws or God's plans for human sexuality are a strong influencing factor.


Naturally, its legal in Scandinavia. Thats a big plus for liberals.

Zoosexuality is permitted in a few countries, such as Sweden and Denmark

----------------------------------------------------

You need to check the sex laws in red states vs blue states. There are differences.

Like what red/blue state differences are you thinking of?