SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (487398)6/12/2009 1:52:53 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573431
 
Maybe you didn't get four justices who thought there where serious constitutional issues (or at least serious enough to put on their case load which is kept smaller than it was in the past). That doesn't imply there where not serious problems with the case.



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (487398)6/12/2009 1:33:36 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1573431
 
"They must not have thought anything was going on that merited a review by the Supreme Court."

Well, according to the decision, they say the plaintiffs weren't able to make the case that it should be reviewed. Which is almost the same thing, but not quite.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News