Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Swine Flu -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Felix who wrote (245)	6/12/2009 9:23:04 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 463

If you don't know, make a conspiracy theory. Occam's razor would cut most conspiracy theories down. It is not necessary to believe a cabal of people killed Kennedy either. But... But obviously waiting patiently by the book depository on the 7th floor, where you know the motorcade is going to be, getting a job there, just to shoot that person. That is hard for a single individual to do. Very hard. It seems to becomes necessary for he to have had accomplices. Accomplices who could arrange his job there, and then change the parade route at the last minute to that route. Originally when Oswald got the job at the book repository, the parade route was not past the window at all. It was changed 3 days before the event. Now that should start a conspiracy theory worthy of the name. The only problem is it does not prove it. Even if he purchased the rifle well before that, he could still have made up the idea at the last minute when he saw the final route. So no conspiracy necessary. 65 people connected with the event died violently or under strange circumstances within 3 years of it however, including Dorothy Kilgallen, who had more inside connections than an electrical wiring system. It is necessary to hide the government knowledge of the event for 50 years after his death. Why? The greatest benefit it would appear would be blur evidence that points overwhelmingly to living people. Dead men don't have to answer difficult questions. There are only so many reasons to hide the information, that must be evidentiary. If it were just the mob, it would not be necessary. If it were the Soviet Union or its client Cuba, then maybe it might be a good idea. But it would also be a great idea if it were the government itself. Now they wouldn't do that, would they? Of course not. I firmly believe that. Anytime a gunman who is a lone nut gets a job or gets a room just where he can get a shot at the victim who will arrive later. it is highly highly suspect. Occam's razor is significantly blunted here. The gunman who killed King got his room before King was given his. Hmmmmm.... no can't be a conspiracy. No way. I am probably among the few people left in North America who actually knows if the death of these two men were a conspiracy. I can tell emphatically that they were not. How do I know? Simple. They told me so. EC:<-}