SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: R2O who wrote (24818)6/12/2009 1:27:27 PM
From: gg cox  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
I breath air, and other things, on the world i live on, in these proportions mistupid.com now that puts co2 in perspective.



To: R2O who wrote (24818)6/13/2009 12:44:08 AM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 36917
 
The CO2 Doomsters don't allow you to see the code because it's top secret. They don't want to have people criticize their caricatures of climate, so they don't let them see them. <
The climate models, as far as I've seen (educate me please if not true --- show me the code, not AlGore quotes!), are 'flat earth' models.
>

The world you live in has deep ocean currents which take vast amounts of CO2 to the depths for 1,000 years. Their models don't account for that either.

The world you live in has chlorophyll and deserts and the extent of each oscillates over millennia. Their models don't include that.

The world you live in has a very bright sun shining on it with significant variation in output. Right now, the sun-spot cycle is at a low ebb. As predicted by Mq, it is NOT picking up steam. When the sun is at a low ebb, there's less insolation and we get colder. It is NOT a good time to attack Moscow when the sun-spot cycle is at a low ebb [as found by Napoleon in 1812]. noconsensus.files.wordpress.com

The models are obviously hopeless because even over a short time [a decade] their models have failed. Give them a century and they'd be laughable.

Mqurice