Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (487505)	6/12/2009 12:15:34 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1572604

just like that lying weasel Mikey LOL!! Imagine a useless, amoral pig like you sitting in judgment on others....

To: bentway who wrote (487505)	6/12/2009 12:18:37 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572604

Wharf is a dual loyalty guy, eh bentway? Again, wanting fair treatment for israel by highly critical of israel WR is far better than your anti american and traitorous stance. You have no loyalty to america. At worse Wharfy is 50/50 in your view. I will take wharfys 50 and day over your ZERO, you POS>

To: bentway who wrote (487505)	6/12/2009 12:38:17 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572604

Almost half the vetoes in the history of the Security Council were cast by the Soviet Union. Since shortly before the fall of the USSR, the United States has been the most frequent user of the veto.[4] Between the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the end of 2004, vetoes were issued on 19 occasions. For that period, usage breaks down as follows: the United States used the veto on 13 occasions (11 regarding the Middle East, one Bosnia, one in 1989 following its invasion of Panama) Russia/the Soviet Union used the veto on 4 occasions (two regarding Cyprus, one Bosnia, one Myanmar) en.wikipedia.org