Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (13573)	6/12/2009 12:44:19 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

Not promoting it, but that is the argument. I'm glad you're not promoting it, it's a weak argument... the law is clear and unequivical that within the first trimester a woman has the right to have this procedure. It cannot be forced on her but it is her right. Therefore, a woman who makes a concious choice about her own body If it were legal to water board, then the same weak argument could be used to counter... a woman who makes a concious choice about her own body in the first trimester is not "torturing" Torture is torture, if it's legal then it's still torture just that it would be legal... You're entire argument is very weak, I would like to see a true liberal's explanation, unless you're saying you're a liberal... But still, thanks for trying, that's more than any liberal would attempt, I'm sure... GZ