Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (487554)	6/12/2009 1:04:20 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574761

So...you lied. He never advocated violence. He reported accurately. Why is it that so many pinhead liberals just cant stomach the truth?

To: Alighieri who wrote (487554)	6/12/2009 1:12:22 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574761

He didn't say...go kill this guy, but, when you call someone a baby killer on national TV over and over, with anger in your voice and expression, you should expect that some fringe lunatic will take up the cause, as we have seen...so he owns this one...i hope the family of the doctor make him really own it. Do you think the reporters on 60 Minutes (and the rest of the nutjob media) who played up the Abu Ghraib story which resulted in the deaths of American soldiers ought to be squelched, or at least, held civilly liable for those deaths?

To: Alighieri who wrote (487554)	6/12/2009 2:16:53 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574761

Do you have a link to where O'Reilly ever advocated that people commit violence against Dr. Tiller? He didn't say...go kill this guy, but, when you call someone a baby killer on national TV over and over, with anger in your voice and expression, you should expect that some fringe lunatic will take up the cause, as we have seen...so he owns this one...i hope the family of the doctor make him really own it. Plus, O'Reilly is the very embodiment of anger and rage. Anyone who has witnessed one of his tantrums can attest to how deeply that rage goes.

To: Alighieri who wrote (487554)	6/13/2009 3:57:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574761

Al, > i hope the family of the doctor make him really own it. LOL, the deepest pockets always get sued. Who cares about the 1st amendment? Tenchusatsu

To: Alighieri who wrote (487554)	6/14/2009 11:10:19 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Respond to of 1574761

First of all the guy isn't a doctor because he has violated the hippocratic oath..."First of all do no harm" The Hippocratic Oath (Modern Version) I SWEAR in the presence of the Almighty and before my family, my teachers and my peers that according to my ability and judgment I will keep this Oath and Stipulation. TO RECKON all who have taught me this art equally dear to me as my parents and in the same spirit and dedication to impart a knowledge of the art of medicine to others. I will continue with diligence to keep abreast of advances in medicine. I will treat without exception all who seek my ministrations, so long as the treatment of others is not compromised thereby, and I will seek the counsel of particularly skilled physicians where indicated for the benefit of my patient. I WILL FOLLOW that method of treatment which according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patient and abstain from whatever is harmful or mischievous. I will neither prescribe nor administer a lethal dose of medicine to any patient even if asked nor counsel any such thing nor perform the utmost respect for every human life from fertilization to natural death and reject abortion that deliberately takes a unique human life.</B? WITH PURITY, HOLINESS AND BENEFICENCE I will pass my life and practice my art. Except for the prudent correction of an imminent danger, I will neither treat any patient nor carry out any research on any human being without the valid informed consent of the subject or the appropriate legal protector thereof, understanding that research must have as its purpose the furtherance of the health of that individual. Into whatever patient setting I enter, I will go for the benefit of the sick and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief or corruption and further from the seduction of any patient. WHATEVER IN CONNECTION with my professional practice or not in connection with it I may see or hear in the lives of my patients which ought not be spoken abroad, I will not divulge, reckoning that all such should be kept secret. WHILE I CONTINUE to keep this Oath unviolated may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the art and science of medicine with the blessing of the Almighty and respected by my peers and society, but should I trespass and violate this Oath, may the reverse by my lot.