SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (309748)6/13/2009 8:25:04 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793770
 
Stop Worrying and Enjoy the Recession! Yeah, a recession can be nice if you’ve got steady income. And, of course, a recession under President Obama is surely a good thing for America and Americans! Under Bush it would have been a disaster of Steinbeckian proportions, but under Obama it’s a “purifying fire!”
maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com

The Recession Is Great
Elisabeth Eaves, 06.12.09, 12:01 AM ET

This week I refinanced my mortgage at a new, better rate, lowering my monthly expenses with a stroke of the pen. Even as I was doing the paperwork, I had to dodge calls trying to offer me similar and even better rates. If you're creditworthy these days, banks can't shovel money at you fast enough.

This got me thinking about all the other ways in which this recession might be a good thing. Job losses and property devaluations have inflicted much pain, but relentless focus on catastrophe leaves out the flip side of market logic: Prices will tumble until goods find buyers, making it a very good time to go shopping. The recession's benefits also go beyond the purely tangible. Last week I met an artist, Kendrick Mar, who compared the downturn to a "purifying fire." We were talking about the end of high prices for bad work. But there's something else going on too: a burning away of dross in our personal and working lives.

To start with the most literal example, there's a global sale on, so if your own income hasn't plummeted, the getting is good. Interest rates are down. Property prices too. Residential and commercial rents, even in New York City, are down--not, perhaps, south of 14th Street in Manhattan, but elsewhere in the city, mere mortals are negotiating better deals with their landlords, or moving to neighborhoods they had thought were out of reach.

Financial blogger and investment adviser Barry Ritholtz singles out a few more goods that are going cheap: boats, jewelry, Picassos and Monets, second homes. "Make a list of the favorite things that you want, and put in a low-ball offer, and tell people the offer is good for six months," he says. "Your spending habits should be countercyclical; You don't buy, buy, buy when the economy is great."

The downturn has procured a related outbreak of pleasant behavior: Tradesmen, salespeople and restaurant reservationists have lost their standoffish attitude. "Walk into a car dealer now, and that whole veneer of obnoxiousness is gone," Ritholtz says.

GM is going out of business, their bulky, expensive-to-run vehicles to be lost, perhaps, in the purifying fire. But new ventures are starting too. Michael Benstock, CEO of Superior Uniform Group, explains what his company has been up to. Faced with shrinking demand--higher unemployment means less need for uniforms--Superior Uniform laid off staff and posted a loss in the first quarter of 2009.

On the other hand, it's cutting deals with vendors and looking for other companies to buy. "We feel the timing is great for acquisitions," he says. "There are a lot of weakened competitors out there." And after nine decades in the garment trade, the company last year branched out. It needed to outsource more customer service functions to save money and figured other companies did too. So it turned an in-house call center in El Salvador into a separate business, The Office Gurus, that now serves not only Superior Uniform but also other U.S. firms. "Our timing was impeccable," Benstock says, though that was as much because of luck as design. The 150 Salvadorans employed by The Office Gurus have profited.

Then there are the opportunities for change in individual careers. If you still work for a newly downsized company, in all likelihood there is not quite enough labor to go around. That can be exhausting, but it's also a chance to seize new responsibilities. Raises may not come back into fashion for a while, but you can be first in line when they do.

A layoff can be gut-wrenching. But it's also a chance to ask yourself: Were you really happy about the job before it ended? If not, what can you now change that you couldn't before? The Web magazine RecessionWire (subtitle: "The Upside of the Downturn"), whose founders were themselves laid off from other companies, has nursed this idea of reinvention over the last half year, with stories on poverty-provoked spiritual awakenings and musings on next steps. As adults we rarely get to ask ourselves, "What do I want to do when I grow up?" The unemployed may fantasize about financial stability, but the fully employed fantasize about having just a darn minute to think. All the focus on "Plan B" is infectious, causing even the employed to ask themselves, if only as a parlor game, what would I do?

The juiciest personal recessionary benefit, though, may be getting out of things we didn't want to do in the first place by pleading financial hardship. A friend's back-of-beyond wedding? Too expensive. A conference in another city? Company cutbacks say no: Watch the Webcast instead and be home in time for dinner. With so many people out of work, the pressure to keep up financial appearances has disappeared. It's easier than ever to gracefully decline going out for a mediocre $60 meal. We should have better aligned our budgets with our desires all along, but now feel more bold about doing so.

In my neighborhood, the number of empty storefronts has crept upward over the last six months. I wonder if I should be alarmed. It's eerie, but also suggests a neighborhood on pause, taking a breath before chugging along in some new direction. Vanity Fair's James Wolcott, writing recently on the glories of 1970s New York, noted that the population shrank by 10% over the decade. He observed:

"It was hell on the tax base but, for those who migrated to New York and secured a foxhole while the city bled out, terminal conditions weren't all bad. There were upsides to a downward spiral. Having fewer people clogging the scenery aired out the city nicely, opening corner pockets of private and public space where all sorts of termite creativity could take place, and did."

We may be in for more crime and grime, but also more breathing room as some of the hype and waste goes up in flame. Economists are predicting a recovery, anywhere from an optimistic "it's already started" to a cautious 2011. Enjoy the recession while it lasts.

Elisabeth Eaves is a deputy editor at Forbes, where she writes a weekly column. Follow her on Twitter here.

forbes.com



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (309748)6/13/2009 8:25:52 AM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 793770
 
the "we need to hurry and get it done or else" excuse by all the politicians has reached the end of its life I think...



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (309748)6/13/2009 10:22:17 AM
From: Nadine Carroll5 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793770
 
There is no doubt that Obama has bitten off far more than he can chew, and has doubled down by personalizing so many initiatives. The Cairo speech was noteworthy not only because Obama appeared in it 68 times, but also because at 30 points in the speech, he told other people and nations what they “must” do.

Obama’s line in the Cairo speech that no single nation should decide who should have nuclear weapons was widely taken as a rebuke to American power. However, there is another reading of this which is consistent with Obama’s constant first-person references and his personal ability to tell his listeners what they “must” and must not do. America shouldn’t tell other nations what they must do, but Mr. Obama thinks it is just fine for him to personally do so. Newsweek may have gotten it about right.

You will recall President Obama’s speech as ASU, where he derided traditional American aspirations of getting ahead in life, even as he ticked off, one by one, his own achievement of each of those goals. Hmmm. Let’s see. Aloof, charismatic, obsessed with power, “absolutely certain” that he has a special personal destiny. This can’t end well. No, this can’t end well at all.


I'm amazed more people haven't clued into this yet. But then, I'm amazed more people didn't clue into this during the campaign. The signs were all there. But people fooled themselves into thinking Obama was much too bright to fall for the stupid stuff he was saying to win the affection of the masses. Talk about outsmarting yourself.

Here's a simple thought exercise: Forget about Barack Obama for a minute. Just try to imagine a generic liberal President, very ambitious but not very experienced, presiding over a new administration and majorities in Congress. A President Bartlett type but not as savvy. Okay, ask yourself: what mistakes would he make?

I'm ticking off my list:
1. Thinks he can just propose self-evidently good ideas (to liberals) and have them become bills and sail through Congress, so he has waaaay too many irons in the fire.
2. Hasn't got enough experienced hands to establish order in the administration, so the chain of command is a zoo.
3. Thinks that people will do what he tells them to, because he's President and he says so.
4. Thinks the tools of campaign - a charm offensive and exaggerated rhetoric - will work for governing, without any behind-the-scenes heavy lifting. Besides, he has too many balls in the air to spare the time for any heavy lifting.
5. Thinks the tools of campaign work for foreign policy too. After all, everybody just wants to find a just compromise, right?
6. Thinks the limits imposed by the markets and American legal tradition are observed only by the timid. The bold leader makes his own rules. That's what FDR did, didn't he?
7. Due to steps 1 thru 6, he winds up saying things he didn't really mean to say, or which have unfortunate implications, which then have to be ignored or clarified or walked back, leading to unnecessary confusion.

and so on. I'm sure you can add your own examples. I see Obama running down the list. This really cannot end well. I swear, lots of people who never even supported Obama must still be mezmerized by his supposed greatness, for this not to be obvious yet. Or maybe they are just mezmerized by all those balls in the air.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (309748)6/13/2009 4:21:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793770
 
David Warren (no fan of Obama) thinks he does have the stuff to keep seeming Presidential:

On the other hand, the new president has the benefit of a "honeymoon," in which hope may still have the advantage over reason. Many who voted against him are now hedging: maybe he won't be as bad as they feared. After all, he must lead the whole country now, not just one very interested Party. And the sheer novelty of the new face, or by now a known face in a new role, counts for some abeyance of judgement.

On the third hand, honeymoons are not always happy. The phenomenon of "buyer's remorse" is associated with seeing something one has purchased in a new light. What seemed so enchanting in a shop window may look rather tawdry when we get it home, especially in the moment when we realize that it is non-returnable. Thus a plunge from public favour may be very sudden, and its consequences may endure.

With these tests in mind, I think Barack Obama came quite well out of his first 100 days. The personal qualities that got him elected do transfer to elected office, in his case. He is eloquent and unflappable; he is unreadable yet outwardly consistently charming; he looks close up when at a distance, and at a distance when close up; he is smooth and ruthless in the pursuit of his political goals. He has, as we already knew, the gift of charisma with crowds, the seemingly magical ability to embody sweet reason even when making statements entirely hollow of substance. There is something very presidential in that.

I was especially impressed with the way he remained "above the fray" when one cabinet appointment after another proved to be a dog. Somehow it wasn't Obama's mistake; somehow it became the fault of the person he had appointed. The new president had the gift of making himself invisible at will; though it should be said that he depends on supine mass media to accomplish this trick.

realclearpolitics.com

But I think Tom Bevan has a good point: if you keep over-promising, you better not under-deliver. Obama is in grave danger of under-delivering. Will the media remain entirely supine when he does? Will the blame always go elsewhere? TWT