Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energyplay who wrote (121705)	6/17/2009 5:35:34 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 206085

Who Says America is Behind in the Nuclear Renaissance? .Babcock and Wilcox announced their mPowerTM modular nuclear power plant. The company making yesterday's announcement is .full of hard nosed engineers, manufacturers and technicians that generally "do" rather than talk.. ELMAT: Alwats trust a plan or new design if the pole-climbers are on board!! Who Says America is Behind in the Nuclear Renaissance? Ed. Note: On Thursday, Rod Adams, who writes the Atomic Insights Blog, wrote a good piece about the announcement of a new design for a modular nuclear power plant. Here at Energy Tribune, we see modular nukes as having huge potential. See our prior coverage here. We are running Adams' posting here with his permission. Sometimes, games really do change while few people are watching. That is what happened yesterday when .Babcock and Wilcox announced their mPowerTM modular nuclear power plant. The big difference is not the basic technology - after all, the mPower reactor is a pressurized water reactor using the same kind of coolant, the same kind of heat engine, and even the same kind of fuel elements - though not as long - as two thirds of the nuclear power plants operating today. . The important difference is not even the significantly reduced unit size or the lifetime used fuel storage or the five year refueling cycle. The real difference that this system has been announced by a group of people for whom the idea of a "paper reactor" is a long engrained curse. Admiral Rickover, the man who led the Navy's nuclear power program for more than 30 years, often railed against "paper reactors" that could do amazing things and provide incredible improvements over the systems that he was busy installing on a series of submarines. Even Amory Lovins has been known to use the memory of Admiral Rickover's dismissal of these systems as a curse designed to dampen enthusiasm. Of course, EVERY reactor starts as a paper reactor, but Admiral Rickover's real point was that the paper should be representative of components that were real and did not require some kind of new invention or discovery before they could be produced. (Some involved in the Nautilus program will admit that sometimes even Rickover broke that rule, like when he decided that zirconium alloys would be the right cladding to protect the fuel from the hot water coolant.) The company making yesterday's announcement is .full of hard nosed engineers, manufacturers and technicians that generally "do" rather than talk.. ELMAT: Alwats trust a plan or new design if the pole-climbers are on board!! While most of the people involved in the current energy conversation believe that the US has lost or sold its manufacturing and building experience related to producing useful power from the atom, B&W has continued manufacturing most of the key components of the propulsion systems that power our newest aircraft carriers and submarines. They have also continued to produce steam generators in their US factories. That manufacturing and knowledge base remains in the US. While B&W is involved in some key aspects of fourth generation reactors like the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP), it has a corporate philosophy of evolving and building. By deciding to jump into the nuclear renaissance with a light water reactor, they believe that they have not taken a step backwards in technology. Instead, they are convinced that they have taken a big step forward in applying what they already know how to do very well to a completely new market for their core competency - delivering high quality manufactured components with a pedigree and integrating them into a useful (fully licensed) and reliable power source on a predictable schedule and at a predictable cost. Here is a bullet list of the key features of the mPowerTM as I see them: Pressurized water reactor (PWR) 17 x 17 fuel bundles (Shorter than normal, but otherwise standard) Five year refueling schedule Fuel storage pool large enough for 60 years worth of fuel Adaptable to advances in LWR fuel (MOX or thorium) Below grade construction in most locations Air cooled condensers Tall, thin pressure vessel Passive cooling Manufactured system with rail delivery to site American engineering and manufacturing (avoids queue at Japan Steel Works) 125 MWe of electrical power output (I admit, I was wrong yesterday with my prediction of an even smaller system, but 125 MW is about 10th the size of the AP-1000.) Knowing what I know about the company's performance for a very demanding customer, I feel reasonably confident that the timelines announced yesterday (design certification application in 2011, COL application in 2012, full license in 2015 and commercial operation in 2018) are not "stretch goals", but are reasonably achievable with some margin for the inevitable obstacles. Though the company made it very clear during yesterday's press conference that they are not going to be quoted on an expected cost - there are still way too many variables in the equation all with uncertainty ranges - company leaders did state that they expected to be able to produce their 125 MWe modules for a competitive price per kilowatt of capacity. I have to admit something. While listening to the ten speakers (five from industry and three senators and two congressmen), I got a bit choked up. It was refreshing and even inspiring to hear about manufacturing reliable, affordable, zero emission power plants in North America (B&W maintains some of its manufacturing capability in Canada). I kept thinking about all of those Americans who love to MAKE THINGS and who love to go home at the end of the day knowing that they have produced something more useful than paper, presentations or spreadsheet figures. I thought about all of the people I know who enjoy bending metal and creating items of real precision and beauty. I thought about the importance to the entire economy of having reliable power systems. I thought of how nice it will be for electrical power suppliers to know that when their customers need more power they will be able to order a new unit, secure in the knowledge that it will be delivered on schedule, that it will work when it is needed, and that it's final price is the same as what the company promised. Watch out world. We appear to have some leaders left after all. energytribune.com

To: energyplay who wrote (121705)	6/17/2009 9:08:33 AM
From: Ed Ajootian	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206085

WORLD WATCH Iran's hotly disputed elections don't pose an immediate threat to global oil supplies or energy markets, but their long term impact is likely to be considerable. With some 8 million barrels per day of surplus capacity, world oil markets could easily absorb the highly unlikely loss of 3 million b/d of Iranian exports. In fact, Saudi Arabia alone could fill the gap. But the massive demonstrations across the country are a reminder of the revolution 30 years ago and the cracks that have opened up more visibly in the Islamic republic have important implications for Tehran's energy future. Iran is likely to become more inward looking as it wrestles with internal discord and already stymied investment could slow further, partly due to stiffer sanctions but also due to the domestic tensions, which could take a long time to resolve. Iran's oil production has never recovered to pre-revolutionary levels and it now looks increasingly doubtful that the country will be able to achieve its output growth targets.Tom Wallin, New York ********************************************************** From energyintel.com, it deftly puts the Iran issue into perspective. I always appreciate these guys' balanced but insightful commentary.