SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Step1 who wrote (165110)6/16/2009 7:45:58 PM
From: robnhood  Respond to of 313182
 
It is like everyone on your street being able to purchase fire insurance on your house.
Many more CDS were sold then there were underlying bonds.
Firms Like Goldman Sachs purchased tons of CDS off of AIG on all kinds of instruments that they did not own. Essentially a bet that the underlying would fail. ( helped along by shorting the shit out of the stock)
The US taxpayer has made good on all of these bets even though firms like Goldman were well aware that AIG would not be able to honour their commitments. IMO.



To: Step1 who wrote (165110)6/16/2009 7:52:26 PM
From: robnhood  Respond to of 313182
 
<<but hey, maybe this is the perpetual energy machine...>>
It sure was treated as one until the SHTF. Actually they are still allowed. You can buy CDS on US treasuries. No need to hold the underlying bonds.
Who I ask will be able to honour that CDS should the US fail?



To: Step1 who wrote (165110)6/16/2009 7:56:47 PM
From: heinz44  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 313182
 
How can paying 80% to insure 100% equals 400%???
mmmmmmmmmmmmm
you got me there.........I thought % means out of 100
so what is 400%
I wish someone would take me thru this............its been bugging me since junior high days and I cant get it