Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (113597)	6/18/2009 11:57:35 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541777

June 18, 2009 HEALTH CARE POLLING.... A few new national polls were released over the last 24 hours, but of particular interest are public attitudes about health care reform. The data from the new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll seems relatively encouraging. Without being told anything specific about the Obama plan in the survey, about a third of people said it's a good idea, about a third said it's a bad idea and the rest had no opinion. When given several details of his approach, 55% said they favored it, versus 35% who were opposed. There was also support for the Democratic push to let people sign up for a public health-care plan that would compete with private companies, one of the toughest issues in the health-care debate. Three in four people said a public plan is extremely or quite important. But when told the arguments for and against the plan, a smaller portion, 47%, agreed with arguments in support of the plan, with 42% agreeing with the arguments against it. Americans are, in other words, open to persuasion. They don't know they like Obama's approach, but approve when they hear about it. The public option fares very well -- 75% support is tremendous -- but hesitate when confronted with conservative arguments. If the White House has a powerful communications strategy in mind, now would probably be a good time to launch it. The same poll found majority support for requiring all Americans to get insurance, but majority opposition to taxing health benefits. Gallup, meanwhile, also issued an interesting poll, which asked respondents to say whether or not they have confidence in various groups and names involved in the health care policy debate. Doctors, hospitals, and President Obama all fared pretty well, with majorities expressing confidence. At the bottom we see pharmaceutical companies (40%), insurance companies (35%), and congressional Republicans (34%). That's right, GOP lawmakers fared even worse than insurance companies. With these results in mind, mcjoan asks the right question: "So, for the 432nd time, why do the Democrats feel it is so critical for 'bipartisanship' on this one? No one is demanding it except Republicans who keep showing, time, and time, and time again that they are not going to help." —Steve Benen 10:35 AM washingtonmonthly.com

To: JohnM who wrote (113597)	6/18/2009 12:08:25 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541777

John; Rather, the Obama plan is little more than an attempt to stick some new regulatory fingers into a very leaky financial dam rather than rebuild the dam itself. Perhaps, but isn't Obama starting at a much higher level of regulation than Roosevelt did? Krugman was on this very issue last night on PBS news. (I can't see Krugman now without thinking of you - you don't look like him too do you? - that I think of you is a compliment BTW). Anyway, ...Krugman said the regulation of Obama's was generally good. He said he would have gone a little further, but in general he was happy with it. The woman from the (? ABA) said - of course - that the regulation went too far. I would regulate them to the point of telling them when they can take a potty break - but, BUT, it is the big banks that need regulation. Too big to fail is NOT acceptable. steve