Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (113621)	6/18/2009 3:39:05 PM
From: slacker711	Respond to of 541743

How about lower the interest rates. They did exactly that. Interest rates were sub 5%...which is as low as they have ever been historically. It would have taken an enormous amount of money to get it much farther down than they managed to do for the relative bargain price of $300 billion. Slacker

To: Suma who wrote (113621)	6/19/2009 12:24:54 AM
From: Norrin Radd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541743

On Hiding behind "State Secrets": "...The CIA's rendition and torture program is not a "state secret." It's a national disgrace. On Friday, the Justice Department asked the 9th District Court of Appeals to rehear its argument to throw out our extraordinary rendition lawsuit on the basis that it cannot be tried without revealing "state secrets." We must not protect torturers and their enablers from accountability for their actions. And we must not let the government hide behind the overly-broad use of state secrets. Ask your representative to co-sponsor the State Secrets Protection Act of 2009 and limit the claim of "state secrets" to specific evidence. action.aclu.org. The ACLU's extraordinary rendition lawsuit was filed by five men who were forcibly kidnapped and secretly transferred to U.S.-run prisons where they were tortured. The case targets Jeppesen DataPlan, a subsidiary of Boeing that provided crucial support services to the CIA for illegal torture flights. The Bush administration initially had the case thrown out by improperly asserting the "state secrets" privilege. The ACLU appealed and in May, won the right to move forward with the case. Now the government is trying to throw the case out again. On Friday, the Justice Department asked the appeals court to rehear the decision and uphold its bogus "state secrets" claim. Contact your member of Congress and ask them to co-sponsor the State Secrets Protection Act. action.aclu.org. The government has asserted the "state secrets" claim with increasing regularity in an attempt to throw out lawsuits and justify withholding information from the public. Let's be clear -- no one is interested in taking away the government's legitimate right to protect sensitive national security information. But, the Bush administration expanded the definition of "state secrets" dangerously beyond its previous limits and set a dangerous precedent that has continued. In addition to extraordinary rendition, the claim of "state secrets" has also been made about illegal wiretapping, torture and other breaches of U.S. and international law. Supporting this bill will have an impact on countless civil liberties cases in the months and years ahead. Please take a moment to contact your member of Congress and ask them to co-sponsor the State Secrets Protection Act. action.aclu.org. Thank you for standing with us. Sincerely, Caroline Fredrickson, Director ACLU Washington Legislative Office..."