Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (489348)	6/21/2009 5:49:26 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572102

Do you really think that sentence of buzzword-loaded asstalk makes sense? All it says is that they charge what the market will bear, above their cost, where ever they can sell drugs. The only reason OUR market "bears" the main cost burden is our Pharma-bought pols make it so. Canada bears more of a burden than Mexico, but Big Pharma doesn't LOSE money on the drugs it sells in Mexico. Mexico pays more than Uganda, but Big Pharma doesn't LOSE money in Uganda EITHER.. Big Pharma won't sell drugs at a LOSS, ANYWHERE. Hell......these new super drugs can cost anywhere from $60k to 120k for one year's treatment for one person. Its cheaper to die.