Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (310913)	6/21/2009 6:46:26 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793622

Juan Williams shows that it is possible to be a liberal Democrat and still cover Obama fairly and rationally. The Left sees him as a "Uncle Tom Republican."

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (310913)	6/21/2009 11:15:40 AM
From: gamesmistress	4 Recommendations Respond to of 793622

"the reputation of big media" Henry Blodget says that the TV industry today is like the newspaper industry of 5 yeas ago. In denial. If the MSM had no competition, why should they care? But more and more the Internet is revealing that the MSM is wrong or flat out lying. So people can and do look elsewhere. The abundance of info getting out of Iran despite the regime's best efforts brought to mind a story of John Stoessel's. He said a colleague, an employee of one of the major networks, was in LA when an earthquake struck. He called the office and they wouldn't report it because it wasn't on the AP newswire. Their own guy was an eyewitness and they wouldn't report it. The TV Business Is Toast Henry Blodget The traditional TV industry -- cable companies, networks, and broadcasters -- is where the newspaper industry was about five years ago: In denial. There are murmurings on the edges about how longstanding business models will come under pressure as Internet distribution takes over. But, so far, the revenue and profits are hanging in there, so the big TV companies don't really care. Specifically, the TV industry's attitude is the same as the newspaper industry's attitude was circa 2002-2003: Stop calling us dinosaurs: We get digital; We're growing our digital businesses; We're investing in digital platforms; People still recall ads even when they fast-forward through them on DVRs; There's no substitute for TV ads. Traditional TV isn't going away: Just look at our revenue and profits! After saying all this same stuff for years, the newspaper industry figured out the hard way that you can't stuff the genie back in the bottle. And over the next 5-10 years, the TV industry will figure this out, too. Here's the problem in a nutshell: As with print-based media, Internet-based distribution generates only a tiny fraction of the revenue and profit that today's incumbent cable, broadcast, and satellite distribution models do. As Internet-based distribution gains steam, therefore, most TV industry incumbents will no longer be able to support their existing cost structures. Specifically, TV business models for the past half-century, from broadcast to cable to satellite, have been built on the following foundation: * Not much else to do at home that's as simple and fun as TV * No way to get video content other than via TV * No options other than TV for advertisers who want to tell video stories * No options other than cable -- and, more recently, satellite -- to get TV * Tight choke-points in each market through which all video content has to flow (cable company, airwaves), which creates enormous value for the owners of those gates. And now, slowly but surely, look what's happening: * Other simple options emerging at home: Internet, video games, Facebook, IM, DVDs * New ways to get TV other than satellite/cable: Hulu, YouTube, iTunes, Netflix * Video-ad options beginning to emerge * More options for getting video content: telcos, cable cos, wireless cos (soon) * Fewer choke points in each market: With an Internet connection anywhere in the world, you will soon be able to get to almost anything. And not just to your computer -- to your television. Thus far, the TV industry has reacted to these changes the way most people would: By trying to port its existing model to the new world and maintain its hold on power and money. This is why we're getting so many ridiculous, consumer-unfriendly TV solutions, such as: * Market-based control over what you can and can't watch (thanks to contracts with local cable companies) * No live-streaming of lots of popular video content despite the fact that this would grow the audience (same reason) * Time-shifting of popular shows (don't want to cannibalize more profitable TV audience) * Hoarding of video libraries that could be easily available, watched, and monetized online * Single episode downloads that expire after 24 hours * $150/month "triple-play" solutions that come larded up with absurd taxes, fees, and service-charges, most of which go to pay for crap we don't want. All these Band-Aid solutions will eventually fail. Why? Because eventually the cable-satellite-airwave monopoly over TV content in local markets will be circumvented by simple, global Internet distribution. rest at: Message 25719419