Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (490050)	6/23/2009 2:22:54 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572175

So, let's see if I can get a clear position from you instead of hot air about "that ain't no poll" (lol): Karl Rove has repeatedly claimed that over 100% turnout is evidence of Democratic voter fraud. Are you agreeing with him? If fairly extensive, yes........after all, in most US elections, turnout is barely at 50%. When its isolated, no. In Iran, two whole provinces saw vote turnout greater than 100%. That's two out of what 7 provinces....that would be the equivalent of 15-20 states. Besides, the situation in this country is different from Iran. In Iran, there is only one agency, the Interior Ministery, that is solely responsible for vote counting. There is no oversight to prevent rigging. In this country, there are more checks to prevent voter fraud. I am curious.....why are you so intent on defending the status quo in Iran?