SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HPilot who wrote (490101)6/23/2009 11:43:44 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573849
 
Some staffers talking to the press simply did not know.

You are just making up shit Hugh.



To: HPilot who wrote (490101)6/23/2009 2:47:55 PM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573849
 
"They have no way of knowing if the phone is on."

Not very technically hip, are you Hugh?



To: HPilot who wrote (490101)6/23/2009 5:07:29 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1573849
 
"They have no way of knowing if the phone is on. They cannot track his phone."

Depends on who "they" are. What can be done is the cell phone company can find out what tower the phone is associated with. If it isn't associated with any tower, then the phone is either off or out of range.



To: HPilot who wrote (490101)7/3/2009 12:30:31 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573849
 
His cell phone hadn't been on for days... did you read the article?

The article is bull shit. They have no way of knowing if the phone is on. They cannot track his phone. Some staffers talking to the press simply did not know.


I bet you must feel pretty stupid now. Huh?