SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (490131)6/23/2009 1:33:50 PM
From: i-node3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572359
 
>>> It's mostly Bush's deficit..

This is simply not true.

Obama's "stimulus" plus his half of TARP alone amount to 1.1 Trillion.

>>> And both have dedicated taxes. In fact they are LOWERING the deficit.

You are a very confused person.

>>> Listen you want the will to cut spending? Raise taxes. No more deficit crap... we pay for what we spend, today, not tomorrow.

Fair enough. And what do we do with the $50 Trillion in accumulated deficits from SS and Medicare?



To: Road Walker who wrote (490131)6/23/2009 1:52:53 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572359
 
RW, > It's mostly Bush's deficit... so no the truth is not at all inconvenient. You ought to try the truth.

Obama has HUGE deficits forecast for the next ten years, much bigger than Bush. This is definitely Obama's deficit.

> Listen you want the will to cut spending? Raise taxes.

You still believe that when people raise taxes on the rich, spending will be cut? There are so many examples of that not working, but don't let that affect your stubborn mind.

But when you raise taxes on everyone, as is what's happening here in CA, spending will indeed be cut.

> I kind of like being called a yellow dog democrat but I don't even come close to fitting the definition.

LOL, you brought up your own yellow dog to illustrate what you think of "wingnuts."

Tenchusatsu