Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (14326)	6/25/2009 8:58:19 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

It would be even cheaper to run everything on hydrogen... so, instead of poisonous carbon monoxide fumes coming out of the exhaust we would have harmless drops of water coming out of the exhaust... and with a punctured fuel tank, instead of leaking gasoline collecting on the ground as a fire hazard we would have hydrogen simply rising to the sky as a harmless gas... The argument that hydrogen is dangerous is really bogus, driving around with tanks of gasoline is far more risky for explosions... GZ