SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bearcatbob who wrote (10022)6/25/2009 9:17:51 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
Hawk, I find the GW argument perhaps one of the most frustrating I have encountered in my life time. It is like a religion.

Agreed.. But even more than that, it's the indifference to natural causes/influences that are staring them right in the face but they remain indifferent.

It they REALLY CARED about GW, they would study how the earth's biosphere has handled CO2 and other GW gases via natural means over it's paleo-climatic history.

Furthermore, it's far more effective to assist the natural biological sequestration systems than to think we can prevent Billions of people from demanding the same quality of life we possess. And they can't afford electric cars.

Hawk



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (10022)6/26/2009 11:53:30 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
It must be particularly frustrating to have most of the scientists in the world disagree with your expert opinion.