SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (491036)6/26/2009 8:22:33 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 1575781
 
"Why should gay marriage lead to man/animal marriage anymore than straight marriage would?"

Talk to parsons. He is for the latter.



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (491036)6/26/2009 9:02:11 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1575781
 
Why should gay marriage lead to man/animal marriage ...

I'll go with liberal judges.



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (491036)6/26/2009 9:43:33 PM
From: combjelly2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575781
 
"Why should gay marriage lead to man/animal marriage anymore than straight marriage would?"

Wanna bet that Rush has been making this very same argument lately? I've noticed when especially Shorty comes up with these off the wall arguments, Rush has been pushing that meme. Tenchu, not as often, but Shorty was pushing this recently.



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (491036)6/27/2009 2:20:52 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575781
 
SD, > Did you argue that giving blacks and women the right to vote would lead to dogs voting?

Fair enough, but what about polygamy? How come the polygamist's definition of marriage shouldn't be given "equal protection"?

Many cultures still accept polygamy, you know. Who said marriage ought to be between just two people?

Tenchusatsu