SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Risky Business who wrote (7243)10/28/1997 4:45:00 PM
From: Sam Golden  Respond to of 13949
 
Risky, I dont think yourmissing anything. tThe MM were
holding the price back at 26 to increase their inventories.

They got enough suckers to sell into them and tommorrow they will be nice enough to let you have some at 28. With all that volume coming in on the offer, no way should that stock stayed where it was. And then when 1 poor sole sold 100 shares, they dropped the bid 1/2.

I watched every trade, if anybody sees it any different i would like to know.

Sam



To: Risky Business who wrote (7243)10/28/1997 10:25:00 PM
From: JOHN CHEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
There's no justice when VIAS up more than 4 and DDIM up more than 3 1/2, and at the same time IMRS only up 2!

IMRS is grossly undervalued based on its triple digit growth rate-no other year 2000 company comes even close!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News