Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (491633)	6/29/2009 7:58:28 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1575173

"If there wasn't at least a reasonable probably we could do it we wouldn't be deploying these various systems at great expense." Sure there would be - to PRETEND that we can - to BLUFF. Lots of bluffing, all through the Cold War. When you bluff in poker, you don't just check on the bet, you RAISE. Do you play poker, Dave?

To: i-node who wrote (491633)	6/29/2009 8:22:20 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575173

"But you said we don't have the capability to shoot down an incoming NK missile and you are obviously wrong, yet cannot bring yourself to admit it." It is only obvious to you. And you have brrn twisting and squirming and waving your hands to try to prove it. Even to the point of twisting what I posted. For example, I never said we didn't have the capability to shoot down an incoming NK missile. I have questioned whether we could do it reliably, but that is a different issue. So, per usual, you erect a straw man, dance and sing and wave your hands and then demand the other person admit defeat because you can throw up text walls.