SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (67635)6/30/2009 6:30:53 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224708
 
I don't object to the outcome but Sonameyor was on the Court of Appeals - not the Supreme Court. A judge on the Court of Appeals should follow precedent and not try to make new law.



To: mph who wrote (67635)6/30/2009 8:15:32 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224708
 
No, they used that as an excuse. The Right Reverend insisted the test be dumped or he would sue ;^)

You can't just assume disparate impact, but that seems to be what the hiring authority did.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News