SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mph who wrote (67639)6/30/2009 6:53:57 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224710
 
Isn't this the first case where the "equal protection" argument prevailed over "disparate impact" in a public employment decision? That sounds like new law.



To: mph who wrote (67639)6/30/2009 8:18:29 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224710
 
Absolutely correct and the USSC was unanimous in that aspect.

The problem with Sotomayer and her panel is that they declined to analyze the case.