Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miklosh who wrote (9915)	10/28/1997 5:19:00 PM
From: derek cao	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

miklosh, I must agree with sonki on this one. Those analysts are just as clueless as we are. Do your own research, in the long run, your guess maybe much better than theirs. good investing. derek

To: miklosh who wrote (9915)	10/28/1997 5:26:00 PM
From: Sonki	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Miklosh, i bot amat last nov. pe was 15, as soon as i heard intel book to bill improving in nov. 96, i knew amat would follow. if intel is growing we grow. Mike murhphy says some of the most obvious things. but sometimes when he is different, he is very wrong. we can all be wrong so not to say he is stupid but he just another opinion. frankly, i listen to kumar and tito and others on this thread more. i have subscribed to his news letter and seen his picks. that's why i say this.... do your own thing and don't listen to this guy. he said csco was in trouble around 45. I bot csco at that time. i even printed on the thread that csco would be 70-75 in july when csco was 45. i m no body and still feel i know more then most of these idiots.