Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (10346)	7/2/2009 3:33:25 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 86356

Guess MM doesn't want to respond to why one of the foremost experts on Polar Bears is being denied the ability to influence GW policy making.. Guess it hurts too much to realize that the GW lobby has LIED to him and everyone else about the impact that GW is having on Polar Bear populations. nwf.org snowcempaints.blogspot.com bearplanet.org articles.latimes.com nrdconline.org endangeredpolarbear.com msnbc.msn.com Just a bunch of SNAKE OIL SALESMEN!!! That's what the GW lobby is.. And it just feeds upon my implicit distrust of what they are trying to push upon our society. Hawk

To: longnshort who wrote (10346)	7/2/2009 9:44:26 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

That's a biased slant on the experiment. Nothing has been proven one way or another by the CERN CLOUD experiment. However, I am glad they are moving forward with it. Their findings will shed light on the probability of another theory being true or false. If the theory ends up being false, I'm sure you will discredit the findings by saying something like "those silly Europeans are all scientific hacks devoted to the liberal green lobby." Isn't that really your modus operandi?