SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MythMan who wrote (389774)7/2/2009 7:20:09 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Respond to of 436258
 
Concurrent Seasonal Factor Bias. The pattern of impossible biases being built into the headline monthly payroll employment continued, with an upside bias of 46,000 jobs in June 2009 reporting (see the accompanying graph). Instead of the headline jobs loss of 467,000, consistent application of seasonal-adjustment factors — net of what I call the concurrent seasonal factor bias (CSFB) — would have shown a more-severe monthly jobs loss of about 513,000. This pattern has generated an upside reporting bias seen in 10 of the last 12 months, with a rolling 12-month total upside headline-number bias of 1,210,000. A worksheet on this is available upon request. (See SGS Newsletter No. 50, for further background.)



To: MythMan who wrote (389774)7/2/2009 7:28:53 PM
From: Terry Maloney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
C'mon dude, just give me a range ... 15-25%, something like that. <g>