SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bearcatbob who wrote (10647)7/5/2009 10:14:37 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86356
 
Yep, a simple tax is exactly what should have been done. But when one party is raving insane and only wants to stop the Dems, even if the Dems have a good idea, then there isn't a partnership that is possible to come up with good solutions. It requires a united country to sell good solutions that are politically difficult to pursue like a simple tax. If the Dems did it, the GOP would be howling about the Dems increasing taxes and the Dems would lose some Congressmen in the next election. Therefore, the Dems impost a Cap and Trade program on us that is at the end of the day a tax, but is so darn complicated just to hide the fact that it is a tax.

So I blame the Dems and the GOP for our country's inability to solve a problem with a simple, cost effective solution.



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (10647)7/5/2009 3:27:59 PM
From: KLP1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86356
 
FEAR: Obama and Soros know that if "all of the above is used" there WILL BE other products that can be used that have at least close to the energy-dense oil......None of them have the same as oil, but perhaps we will find large sources, that can be used at at price that won't bankrupt this country more than it is already.

125,000 BTU per unit of oil....how does solar and wind compare....