SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : SNRS- Sunrise Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nanny who wrote (133)10/28/1997 9:21:00 PM
From: Mack Earnhardt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4140
 
Nanny,

That sounds fantastic!!!

As a PRK patient myself, I can vouch for the several days of discomfort, but I had excellent results (thanks, VISX).

For clarification, I'll mention that Sunrise's product is targeted at a different patient group than the Excimer. I was around 6 diopters "nearsighted" (technically myopia), and would never have been a candidate for the Sun 1000, which treats "farsighted" people (presbyopia), and another condition which I'm not sure of the name for but it's people who need reading glasses (hyperbyopia?)

The basic different is the center of my myopic cornea was curved out too much, and the other conditions are from not curving out enough. PRK removes tissue from the middle, while the Sand process (SNRS) uses heat to shrink tissue around the edges to give the middle some lift (kind of like a couch potato's belly when he tightens his belt <g>).

The point of all this is that it's not a case of Sunrise eating the Excimer's lunch, but actually a vast, unserved market which will pay high rewards to the first successful device manufacturer. Hopefully, that will be Sunrise instead of VISX or BEAM figuring out how to add this treatment to their existing product.

-Mack



To: Nanny who wrote (133)10/28/1997 10:54:00 PM
From: Mike Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4140
 
Nanny, did you get any news on when Surise will enter phase 3?



To: Nanny who wrote (133)10/28/1997 11:07:00 PM
From: Saul H Rosenthal  Respond to of 4140
 
Nanny, Thanks for the great information!

Saul



To: Nanny who wrote (133)10/29/1997 12:58:00 AM
From: Robert C. Petersen  Respond to of 4140
 
Nanny,
Your post was well worth waiting for. I give it five stars for the post of the year and for your time and generosity in sharing it with us:::::nysebob2



To: Nanny who wrote (133)10/31/1997 2:49:00 PM
From: Pierre Panet-Raymond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4140
 
Nanny, were his initials D.C.?

"There was someone from a securities firm there also. He was considering whether to recommend this stock or not. What do you think? Will he?"

SNRS sounds like a better risk/reward at these levels than PRST. Just think you could buy about 1.2MM shares of SNRS with the proceeds from a PRST sale.