SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (313461)7/7/2009 10:42:41 AM
From: Bill4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793916
 
I just don't think having a big butt has anything to do with race. And even if it did, what's the point of harping on it? Lot's of white First Ladies had big butts. One is currently Secretary of State. So what?



To: Brumar89 who wrote (313461)7/7/2009 10:54:23 AM
From: MulhollandDrive4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793916
 
i agree with the women's comments for the most part here...

(can't believe we're discussing MO's butt<g>)

putting the discussion in perspective and not personalizing it wrt MO....people need to understand that the waist size is of greater importance when it comes to a female silhouette...specifically the waist to hip ratio which is explained here:

en.wikipedia.org

there has been much research and discussion on the anthropometry of this...going back to reproductive health....i.e. an 'apple' shape is considered unacceptable as it denotes (correctly) physical ill health...

when the classic 'pear' shape gets the .07 ratio out of whack, (too much junk in the trunk) then the female body loses it's attractiveness (obviously the further out of whack the greater this issue becomes)

however, even with a disproportionately large ass, if the waist is slim, the woman can still appear healthy and attractive



<edit>

now aren't you glad dma brought this up? it gave me the excuse to post a pic of a lovely nude backside<g>

:)