To: miraje who wrote (10923 ) 7/8/2009 2:59:23 PM From: RetiredNow Respond to of 86356 It's interesting, but you are articulating sharp libertarian points of view. We could let individual companies with the profit motive take care of this problem for us, but the economy is not currently equipped to make the transition in the most efficient way. The barriers are too high for entry to spur enough competition and economies of scale. And the subsidies for oil and coal continue, despite no need for subsidies for those mature cash cow industries. So inequities need to be resolved in the market place and bridge investments provided to overcome barriers to entry. Not only that, but if we all see an oil shortage coming from peak oil, why would we not act to prepare our economy for substitutes proactively, instead of waiting until the oil shock is manifest? That kind of grand scale planning is not going to happen at the individual company level. You need a coalition of government, private industry, and academia to come together to create a plan for the future and then each group needs to execute against that plan. That is a far more efficient and effective way of approaching the problem versus the approach you are advocating. In addition, the partnership approach I'm advocating is completely consistent with free market ideals. Companies cannot plan for the long term if they have to deal with a hodgepodge of conflicting state regulations. They need consistency, certainty, and longevity in order to invest in a new industry for the long term. That is the role of a Federal Gov't plan. Set the rules, provide investment, grants, loans, and subsidies to incubate the new industry for a finite period of time. And then get out of the way and let the market and academia do the rest.