SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (15012)7/8/2009 4:26:28 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
I think there are existing laws and regulations that cover this. The problem we had was a repeal of Glass Steagall and other regulations or the lack or regulations over dertivatives markets. What about Fiduciary responsibilities. Current penalty system is mostly slap on the wrist fines and barring people from the Securities industry. Seems to me fraud laws have to kick in at some point of unreasonableness of the risks taken in comparison to what the prospectus says. Obviously Madoff is getting 150 years without a bankslaughter law.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (15012)7/10/2009 2:07:29 AM
From: RMF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Hear hear...a FEW thousand people caused this.

They are basically getting off "scott free" and even profiting from the world wide catastrophe they caused.

If a broker can be penalized, even criminally charged, for giving "knowingly" wrong investment advice, then why can't a banker be charged for "knowingly" giving out deceptively inappropriate loans?