SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Microsoft - The Evil empire -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jerry Heidtke who wrote (142)10/28/1997 8:15:00 PM
From: Kal  Respond to of 1600
 
May you be blessed. well said. That's the bottom line argument to many anti microsofters of which I am one. This is exactly what I try to bring people's attention to. Dilbert bosses do not realize the cost and fall for ...well you explained it pretty well here.
regards
MH #1



To: Jerry Heidtke who wrote (142)10/29/1997 8:11:00 AM
From: Steve Lee  Respond to of 1600
 
>And my MS Certification ID is 3565. I guess that's about 259254 before your's, huh? (Unless MS skipped a few, or use a Pentium to assign numbers...).<

I posted my certification number because somebody who has never met me disputed my line of work. I posted my company details and MS ID No so that what I said I did could be verified.

I'm not sure what point you were making by saying that you have an earlier ID number than mine. Just in case you were trying to give the impression of being some kind of expert on MS software, let me quote from one of your earlier posts:

"I don't work for Novell, although I make my living servicing their products"

Now I understand your bitterness towards Microsoft, they are killing off your market. Why don't you ask Novell to run crying to the DOJ like Netscape?



To: Jerry Heidtke who wrote (142)10/29/1997 9:28:00 AM
From: Typhoon  Respond to of 1600
 
Regarding this certification ID number, I'm not familiar with this. Do they stamp it on your forehead or right hand?

I'm going to start getting very nervous when I see the release of MS Beast 6.65.

Okay, I was only joking, but this part may bother a few people and I'll take some flak, but it's worth stepping back and thinking about:

MS is getting into the embedded market, there is experimentation going on with "embedding" microchips into people (well pets, so far) for the purposes of tracking them or identification, and we also know Gates has been trying to get into the banking world. Anyone read Revelation? I'm not certainly not implying anything, just commenting that the technology we have today is looking more and more like what I've read about end-time prophecy. And, for those like myself, who believe what the Bible says will happen, it's no stretch to assume that computers technology will be key in all of it. The question is who, and when, and exactly how.

Of course, if Gates wants control of the bulk of the embedded world, he's going to have to realize that his wonderful Windows is completely useless for the very vast majority of embedded applications. He's going to have to develop a tiny little OS and then work very hard to convince Motorola, Intel (well maybe not Intel), Hitachi, Microchip, NEC, Zilog, and others that their microcontrollers need an OS, and that they should pay Microsoft a licensing fee for each processor they sell. Or, he could just buy Motorola and make it easier on himself. As stupid as all this sounds, don't be surprized when it happens. Back in the early days, if you had told me I'd be paying over $100 for an operating system, I'd have gone ballistic, yet it's the norm today.



To: Jerry Heidtke who wrote (142)12/10/1997 6:00:00 AM
From: shades  Respond to of 1600
 
A long time ago, it was said that no one ever got fired for buying IBM. Some people would have you believe that is true today for Microsoft. The reality is just a little bit different.

Actually I used to work for IBM and that is not true, I have known several people that got fired for buying IBM. (grin)