Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (493723)	7/9/2009 9:29:42 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577867

Stimulus fizzle has Democrats worried POSTED AT 12:49 PM ON JULY 8, 2009 BY ED MORRISSEY And well they should. Democrats put down an $800 billion bet and locked Republicans out of the room in placing it. They know their party and their President completely owns the results — and those aren’t looking good at all. And like any bad gambler, they want to double down on a lost hand: Five months after Congress approved a massive package of spending and tax cuts aimed at reviving an ailing economy, the jobless rate is still climbing and the White House is scrambling to reassure an anxious public that President Obama’s prescription for economic recovery is on the right track. Yesterday, Obama took time out of his first presidential trip to Moscow to defend the $787 billion stimulus package, arguing that the measure was the right medicine at the right time. “There’s nothing that we would have done differently,” he told ABC News. Back in Washington, senior Democrats on Capitol Hill were nervously contemplating whether additional government stimulus spending may be needed to pull the nation out of the worst recession since the 1930s. Senior administration officials acknowledged that the effects of the stimulus package have been overshadowed by an unexpectedly sharp drop-off in employment since the measure passed in February. But they reported that only about $100 billion has so far been spent and that as increasingly large sums flow out of Washington, the program is on pace to save or create 600,000 jobs over the next 100 days. “It is clear from the data that there needs to be more fiscal stimulus in the second half of the year than there was in the first half of the year,” White House economic adviser Lawrence H. Summers said. “Fortunately, the stimulus program designed by the president and passed by Congress provides exactly that.” But that wasn’t what the White House or the Democrats promised when they passed Porkulus. Barack Obama’s economic advisers demanded fast action, rather than reasoned debate and negotiation, to adopt their recommendations in order to avoid a spike in unemployment in the near term. They got what they wanted — a spending plan that funded just about every liberal fantasy of the last 30 years, save universal health care — and it didn’t do anything to stop rapid unemployment. Why did it fail? Michelle links to a GAO report that shows that the White House lost control of Porkulus spending from the very beginning. States receiving Porkulus money used it to hide budget deficits instead of creating jobs, and the GAO cannot effectively track the money in any case: Overall, states reported using Recovery Act funds to stabilize state budgets and to cope with fiscal stresses. The funds helped them maintain staffing for existing programs and minimize or avoid tax increases as well as reductions in services. States have implemented various internal control programs; however, federal Single Audit guidance and reporting does not fully address Recovery Act risk. The Single Audit reporting deadline is too late to provide audit results in time for the audited entity to take action on deficiencies noted in Recovery Act programs. Moreover, current guidance does not achieve the level of accountability needed to effectively respond to Recovery Act risks. Finally, state auditors need additional flexibility and funding to undertake the added Single Audit responsibilities under the Recovery Act. Here’s where we get into the “saved or created” dodge of the Obama administration. The Porkulus money may have “saved” jobs, but they were government jobs, not the private sector. -- emphasis mine -- Most government employees have union representation, primarily by the SEIU. The only jobs Porkulus may have saved were those of bureaucrats in state government, and mostly to make sure the unions stay on the side of the Democrats. None of that money went into promoting growth in the private sector, which is why unemployment skyrocketed. Capital stayed out of the market, in part because of fears of confiscatory tax increases and in part because of the amount of regulation threatened by the Obama administration, and what capital was left will get eaten up by the cost of Porkulus eventually. And the GAO says it will take months just to get effective reporting on how that money gets spent, regardless of where it goes. Now, Democrats want to do this all over again, saying that all they need to do is bet just a little more to erase their losses. I’d say we need to cut our losses, and the Democrats as well. Hot Air blog

To: Road Walker who wrote (493723)	7/9/2009 5:17:40 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1577867

This is really bad news short term and really good news long term... Its not so bad short term when taken in this context......inventories dropped not only because of production cutbacks but because of increased sales in May. May wholesale inventories fall, 9th straight drop By MARTIN CRUTSINGER – 6 hours ago WASHINGTON (AP) — Wholesale inventories fell for a ninth consecutive month in May, a decline that has contributed to the longest recession since World War II as factories have been forced to slash production amid crimped demand. The Commerce Department said Thursday that inventories dipped 0.8 percent in May, slightly smaller than the 1 percent decline economists had expected. Sales at the wholesale level posted a 0.2 percent rise in May, better than the expected flat reading. It was the best showing for sales since a similar rise in February. The hope is that sales will soon stabilize and help convince businesses that they need to restock, a shift that will give a boost to the ailing manufacturing sector. The further decline in inventories and the small rise in sales left the inventory to sales ratio at 1.29. That's slightly below the 1.31 reading in April, but above the 1.12 reading of a year ago. The May level means it would take 1.29 months to reduce stockpiles at the May sales pace. Wholesale inventories have been falling since September as the worst financial crisis in seven decades rippled through the economy. Wholesale inventories are goods held by distributors who generally buy from manufacturers and sell to retailers. They make up about 25 percent of all business stockpiles. Factories hold another third of inventories and retailers hold the rest. A 1.5 percent drop in inventories of durable goods, items such as autos expected to last at least three years, led the overall decline in May. Inventories of nondurable goods actually rose 0.3 percent. The overall economy, as measured by the gross domestic product, fell at an annual rate of 5.5 percent in the first three months of this year following a drop of 6.3 percent in the final three months of 2008. That marked the steepest six-month decline in GDP in more than a half-century. Economists believe that the economy, which has been in a recession since December 2007, was shrinking in the April-June quarter but at a much slower pace. Analysts are hoping that the economy, helped by the $787 billion economic stimulus package, will actually start growing again in the current July-September quarter although they caution that any rebound will be modest. They expect unemployment, which hit a 26-year high of 9.5 percent in June, will keep rising in coming months and could near 11 percent before the labor market starts to improve.