SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (493765)7/9/2009 1:29:22 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575354
 
>>>"She lost a race and went back to work but the blood was already in the water for the frenzied and unrelenting shark attack."<<<

"Now you are just making stuff up.

Nope that is an absolutely solid characterisation for what has happened since the campaign, whether or not any of your particular points of criticism have validity. That you refuse to acknowledge it is more evidence that your argument is disingenuous.

"The ethics complaints she fronted as a reason for resigning were all but one filed before she was tapped as VP. All but one. Count them. Many of them, in fact, were filed by other Republicans. The one that cost the most money, by far, was filed by Palin herself.

I don't have any information on those complaints so I don't know if what you are saying is correct or not, I suspect there is more too it or another side to it that you are attempting to conceil, as is the usual case with you.

"So this image that you are pushing, that the liberal media has been hounding her, is complete and utter BS."

No it isn't. It is absolutely and unquestionably born out by the evidence that is too obvious for any reasonable being to dispute. Not just the media and not necessarily only liberal media, it is everything I described as part of a frenzy of attack. It's a friggin virtual public stoning like nothing the world has ever witnessed before. History will look back on all this with great loathing and regret as they have other poorly devised agendas where men like you were all filled with righteous indignation as you went about your cruel and brutal destroying.



To: combjelly who wrote (493765)7/9/2009 1:37:57 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575354
 
I didn't say you had, I said you were a champion of left wing attacks on her and her family."

Uh huh. First I didn't attack her family and now I champion them? How does that work?


Brought it up and got no where. Less doesn't see the contradiction. Mystifying but noneless true.

"This what?"

The fact that she bails when things aren't fun any more. Again, the fact she had trouble getting a degree doesn't mean much.


Interesting thing about that degree. Recently, I've read in two different places that none of the six schools she attended had any admission requirements.



To: combjelly who wrote (493765)7/9/2009 1:42:53 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575354
 
The one that cost the most money, by far, was filed by Palin herself.

And the money she claimed was spent on these ethics violations that unfairly cost the residents of AK beacoup bucks.....well that money would have been spent whether there were ethics violations or not:

Message 25770594

There seems to be little that comes out of Palin's mouth that is truthful.......she seems to be the antithesis of Sanders......but less insists on defending her. That speaks volumes re. less's value system.



To: combjelly who wrote (493765)7/9/2009 2:24:04 PM
From: jlallen2 Recommendations  Respond to of 1575354
 
The fact that she bails when things aren't fun any more.

Nonsense....she put her family first. No shame in that.

Again, the fact she had trouble getting a degree doesn't mean much.

Link please? Where did you read she had trouble getting a degree.....she had trouble paying her tuition.....her intelligence is not a bona fide issue....

The fact she bailed on almost everything else, does.

She did not bail on anything without very good justifications.



To: combjelly who wrote (493765)7/9/2009 3:54:50 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575354
 
Uh huh. First I didn't attack her family and now I champion them? How does that work?

It's a hypocritical and dishonorable smear from one who pretends to take such issues seriously.

SD