Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (493913)	7/10/2009 7:57:26 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575272

lol, ted accusing someone of dodging?

To: HPilot who wrote (493913)	7/10/2009 10:18:09 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575272

You're sidestepping. Don't pull a less and pretend you didn't screw up. No, I am not. If the lawyers were not working on Palin's cases then they can clear the backlog of other cases, and the sooner that they can lay one or more of them off, or the Palin's cases may have meant the addition of more lawyers on their staff. The point is the lawyers were there for ethics violations whether they were related to Palin or not and would have been paid the same amount of money. It wasn't an extra cost to AK as caribou barbie suggested.