Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68341)	7/12/2009 1:42:57 AM
From: MJ	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224737

Do all members of Congress have Top Secret Security Clearances-------what's to say that we don't have moles in Congress-----some who should not have access to top secret information such as CIA handles? I am truly wondering what Panetta is attempting to do other than play politics--------is this to protect Pelosi is it even to secure super secret power for Obama? Obama has indicated he will veto legislation from Congress that restricts his power of secrecy----his executive power---that veto would secure super secrecy for Obama for the remainder of his term. If he were re-elected such a veto of legislation would grant him unlimited power as anything in the Congressional legislation would have been negated by his veto making it a positive for Obama. (A very clever move on the part of the President and the Democrat majority to secure power.) Such a piece of vetoed legislation could in fact give him greater power. What a clever way to give the President more power-----include all of the forbidden restricted items in the legislation. The President vetoes the legislation which then becomes a 'talking point' to justify the President's actions. Can't you just hear the one saying--------'Well you know---you know---you know that I vetoed that legislation I can do what I want.'