Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68345)	7/12/2009 10:43:34 AM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 224749

"Of course, Cheney broke the law. He showed contempt for our Constitution and system of checks and balances." Don't want to be bothered with due process?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68345)	7/12/2009 11:20:15 AM
From: Little Joe	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224749

Well it might be nice if we heard from Cheney before we convicted him. Given that the Dems have already convicted him what chance is there that he will be treated fairly. If you are interested in truth justice and the American way, where is your outrage at the firing of the Inspector General who exposed the fraud of Obama'a friend. The truth is both parties are corrupt and it seems as though each party accepts the corruption within but is outraged by the corruption of the other party. I hope we throw them all out in 2010. lj

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68345)	7/12/2009 11:29:09 AM
From: lorne	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224749

ken...What a crock of BS..." Of course, Cheney broke the law. He showed contempt for our Constitution and system of checks and balances.".... If you actually cared about the constitution of the USA you would be seeking proof of hussein's birth place.. Gees what a pile of crap you puke up.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68345)	7/12/2009 12:15:05 PM
From: MJ	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

Did Clinton break the law when he desicated the oval office----his arse should have fried---can't the Dems do any better? You named a candidate for office who had numerous legal problems in Arkansas. Just go to Arkansas and poke around--------the people there know---- they will tell you. Does the Constituion allow for the POTUS to molest young women in the Oval Office? Then you pull up this street dude with no knowledge of America------a drug user in his teens and college days, no national experience, no business experience, no military experience, with a doubtful personal history------maybe an Arab, maybe the son of a Kenyan and maybe not the son of a Kenyan-------------maybe a British Citizen and not American Citizen------used his election to the US State Senate to run for office while abrogating his duties as a Senator as the Dems and him grasp for power. Interesting that Arkansas went for McCain and not Obama-----was it that Arkansas had been duped before with Clinton and didn't want to drink the koolaid with Obama? Thank God we had Bush and Cheney in charge after 9/11/2001----of course you don't live in New York City, Washington D.C. or Pennslyvania------so this was a non-event for you. Please answer one question why are you opposed to the intelligence operations of this great nation? Why do you want the War on Terrorism to fail?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68345)	7/12/2009 4:20:44 PM
From: chartseer	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224749

Oh bummer! From Kenny's own post. "The inspector generals’ report said the new law “gave the government even broader authority to intercept international communications” than did the original program." "even broader authority to intercept international communications" than Bush's did???and just what did the anoited one do? Or just what does he intend to do? Remember who controlled congress in 2008? And now in 2009 with a new administration? nytimes.com comrade chartseer