SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (495018)7/14/2009 10:37:35 AM
From: Road Walker2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575428
 
Iraq wasn't a check on Iran.

As usual you have your head up your ass and blatantly disagree with the experts.

He was NOT going to be overthrown.

Did you stamp your foot on the floor as you wrote that. LOL. How the F do you know?



To: i-node who wrote (495018)7/14/2009 11:22:18 AM
From: bentway2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575428
 
"Iraq wasn't a check on Iran"

That's why we backed Iraq in the Iran-Iraq decade long war. Revising history again Dave?



To: i-node who wrote (495018)7/14/2009 3:10:03 PM
From: combjelly2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575428
 
" Now, with democracy starting to grow next door, the people of Iran decided to act."

Oh, nonsense. There is no evidence that Iraq was any influence at all. It is not like this hasn't happened before in Iran. Similar events occurred in 2003, Bush dutifully gave his support and the clerics used that as 'proof' that the US was behind the revolt and used that to crush it.

Really, learn some history for a change.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News