SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gregor_us who wrote (88803)7/15/2009 12:11:23 PM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Yeah, but... I do think it will trade a lot higher over time -
a relatively short period of time of less than a year,
and 100% gains. You just can't get those easily, it's
an opportunity.

Here is the last time gas did something as wild as now.
Actually, now was a lot more wild to the downside. -g-




To: gregor_us who wrote (88803)7/15/2009 2:48:51 PM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 94695
 
Well, CFTC is making UNG flawed. Otherwise there is nothing
flawed in tracking front month futures.

This is how our markets are manipulated, business as usual -
printed cash must not go push commodities higher, rather,
go into already enormous derivative speculation in interest
rates and stocks.

This step will destroy UNG, USO, and such, since it essentially
prohibits the funds follow their objectives, that is,
tracking commodity price. As a result, premium will appear
in these funds. UFB, if you ask me. And it won't
help - it will push the prices lower short term, only for
them to really Xplode later on. Commodities are driven
by supply and demand.

It's interesting that they do it now that inflation is
back in the picture and folks are worried that the Fed's
printing will cause the bond market to melt.

bloomberg.com

When gold finally takes out 1K, will they prohibit GLD from
tracking the price?

Do not be surprised if they do...