Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68772)	7/16/2009 8:50:52 PM
From: mph	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224707

If that were true, Obama wouldn't have spent a fortune hiding his records, which includes school records. I can usually tell when people in litigation are trying to hide something. Obama wants to hide virtually everything. The problem is that he's co-opted the media, and evidently people like you who are willing to swallow what he says without any kind of critical assessment. Sorry, but I don't buy him at all. He's like the man that a woman gets involved with without knowing his background. No one from his past has stood up for him. Instead, he's done everything possible to disavow the people who most influenced him like Frank Davis, Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. Hey, Ken. Feel free to accept Obama's line of BS. You are in retirement mode and his horrendous economic policies are unlikely to affect you unless your pension funds are in the market. But I am guessing that you don't have a pension fund, so you're living on SS. Why would you care what happens to everyone else?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68772)	7/16/2009 9:35:11 PM
From: tonto	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224707

One would think by now a childhood friend would step forward with support of his birth abroad if he had been...I do not believe that this is a life long lie and will be surprised if it is true. If it were true it would destroy your party for a very long time.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68772)	7/16/2009 11:11:40 PM
From: MJ	Respond to of 224707

Of course discovery will accomplish something. Discovery will reveal how determined Obama is to not reveal the truth one way or the other-------why he has refused and is refusing America this information as required by election laws and our Constitution. Of course, he can also not attend the discovery and thumb his nose at the whole inquiry by sending a lawyer. Obama knows the truth. What is he afraid of----is he afraid of revealing the truth via the documentation. You know as well as we all know on this thread that there is not likely a person alive who witnessed Obama's birth. The one thing the original birth record normally shows is the attending physician if he was born in Hawaii. If that person is alive, then there would be a witness in Hawaii. One of the things that should be requested during discovery is the call for a DNA test-----this could prove whether he is Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. 's son or whether he is Frank Davis's son as has also been alleged or neither of these. Face it--------if Obama is the son of Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. then he is a bastard son since BHObama, Sr. was still married to his Kenyan wife at the time he met Stanley Ann. Obama Sr. was practicing polygamy worldwide. Check the early references it's all there and admitted by his various relatives. As Tom Brokaw said-----'there is a lot we don't know about Obama' just prior to the election. Sure discovery won't prove anything if Barrack Hussein Obama, Jr. refuses to participate in the discovery and to produce the documents and facts. From that viewpoint you would be right. mj