Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (496108)	7/17/2009 6:23:29 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571698

That article did not address the facts of the situation at all. Alford has a report that is a powerful expose, high level, and credible based on diligent research. At least that is how he characterised the report, and that has not been disputed by Boxer or your article. He was there only to present that documentation as evidence for the panel. He also, now has a complaint about how he was treated by Boxer, which is legitimate. Boxer's comments were all about black organizations and how they feel about green energy. Hey, knock knock, nobody dislikes green energy Barbara. None of her comments addressed the economics or the research on development, and the societal impacts, which was the basis of his report. All her commentary had to do with racism. The author of your article suggested Alford's complaint shouldn't count since he ... well I didn't really get why not. Maybe because there were business grants and funding that supported the work that went into the research based report? Is that it? Good job trying to make that sound evil but it's not.