Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (115930)	7/20/2009 3:33:51 PM
From: Dale Baker	Respond to of 541906

Recession in U.S. May Have Already Ended, Leading Index Shows By Carlos Torres July 20 (Bloomberg) -- Components of the index of leading economic indicators are signaling the worst U.S. recession in five decades may be over now, not three to six months from now. Less-known elements of the Conference Board’s report, including ratios and diffusion indexes, bolster the view the contraction has ended. The leading index, a gauge of the economic outlook over the next two quarters, rose 0.7 percent in June, a third consecutive gain, the New York-based research group said today. “The process of coming out of the recession, although still fragile, may be starting,” Ataman Ozyildirim, a Conference Board economist that tracks the business cycle, said in an interview. “If it continues in this way, the NBER committee will look back and tell us the recession ended.” A committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research, a private group in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is the accepted arbiter of when recessions begin and end. The group announced in July 2003 that the last recession had ended in November 2001, indicating their deliberations take time. Several requirements within the Conference Board’s report that economists say need to be fulfilled before a contraction is officially considered over were checked off the list in June. Those were: three straight gains in the ratio of coincident-to-lagging indicators, three months of 50-plus readings in the diffusion index, three consecutive gains in the leading index and an annualized reading over that period in excess of 10 percent. Annual Rate The leading index was up 12.8 percent at an annual rate over the last three months, today’s report showed. It was the best performance since January 2002, two months after the last recession ended. “This is the third straight month of a gain in leaders and suggests that, along with other economic evidence, the U.S. recession might have ended” in the second quarter, Kenneth Kim, an economist at Stone & McCarthy Research Associates in Princeton, New Jersey, wrote in a note to clients. The Conference Board’s index of coincident indicators, a gauge of current economic activity, dropped 0.2 percent after decreasing 0.3 percent the prior month. The NBER cycle-dating committee follows measures in this index to help time downturns. The index tracks payrolls, incomes, sales and production. The diffusion index shows the breadth of gains in the leading index, with figures over 50 showing the majority of components rising. The index registered a reading of 70 in June for a third consecutive month, today’s report showed. Financial Gauges Earlier this year, only the financial components of the leading index -- including money supply and the difference in interest rates between the benchmark 10-year Treasury note and the overnight rate banks charge to borrow from each other --were rising. The increase in the diffusion index shows other measures are also now increasing. “We now have positive moves in the indicators of the real side of the economy,” such as decreasing jobless claims and increasing building permits, the Conference Board’s Ozyildirim said. While the timeframe can vary between three and nine months, on average the leading index reaches a bottom about five to seven months before the end of a recession, Ozyildirim said. “The ‘all clear’ is not quite there, but you are beginning to see the kind of sequence unfolding that will get us there,” he said, referring to the end of the recession. bloomberg.com

To: Dale Baker who wrote (115930)	7/20/2009 3:42:56 PM
From: Travis_Bickle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541906

That is the theory. I've had a number of jobs and I can't think of of a situation where my ancestry made me perform better than a WASP (and we are talking about ancestry, Sotomayor was born and raised in NYC). There was an instance when I was clerking that a judge referred to the "bad guys" in the opinion (it was a drug case) by their ethnicity ... before it was released I pointed out the court didn't generally do that and she was very grateful ... but I don't think it improved the opinion, it just saved her from maybe a 1 in 100 chance of being personally embarrassed. Other than that drafting an opinion has been drafting an opinion, writing tax regs is writing tax regs, drafting a trust is drafting a trust ... ancestry doesn't really play into it. I can't imagine why a wise latina would write a better tax regulation than a WASP, it is very formalized writing, as is drafting appellate court opinions.