Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (9796)	10/29/1997 12:44:00 AM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Again, a very (un)intelligent answer from a "believer." Good Luck! TC

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (9796)	10/29/1997 12:56:00 AM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

Al, the reasoning you used was appropriate, the reason a 'squeeze' would be successful, is because of a large short position forced to cover, not because of a co.'s fundamentals. The shorts were 'betting' the co. would fail, due to fundamentals. If the squeeze brings the shareprice up as the shorts cover, are the shorts happy for the co.! Thats' craziness, its' just as crazy to feel 'guilt' about a large profit a shareholder gets when the shorts bet wrong! Best to you Al, Pugs