Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (497276)	7/22/2009 12:58:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1570893

Z, > Because it's not realistic (nor, I think even a good thing) to expect people to keep their partners low. If you can think of a better way to slow the spread of STDs, let me know. It's going to be a losing battle as long as your attitude prevails, that it's just "unrealistic" to expect people to keep the number of partners low. Good old-fashioned monogamy was tossed out. Now even keeping the number of partners low is being tossed out. And you think that's a good thing? Tenchusatsu

To: SilentZ who wrote (497276)	7/22/2009 1:19:19 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1570893

I've had quite a few sexual partners to this point, and I'm pretty happy I have. .... kids are having sex at an earlier age .... It can lead to them being happier and more comfortable with their own sexuality as adults. And it's pretty natural. There's a formula for a society with a lot of std's, and unplanned pregnacies, and abortions. A simple fact of life.