Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (497857)	7/23/2009 10:54:53 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575907

You honestly believe that modifying the image of a document invalidates the original document? Well, if the document says it, I guess so. Look, I don't have any doubt Obama was born in Hawaii. The birth certificate is apparently not evidence of it, from what little I've read, in that they are not the same as a birth certificate issued in say, Texas. Prior to a particular date, they did not have any repository of such data. The more compelling evidence, IMO, is the birth announcement which appeared contemporaneously in the newspaper. But I don't think it is too much to require that a president of the United States, when there is some doubt as to his qualification, should present an official copy of the birth certificate, which apparently should be on file with the hospital. It is a simple thing and he ought to do it just to end the debate. Too many people are skeptical of his bona fides already. Just end it.