SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (116494)7/25/2009 10:08:16 AM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 542557
 
“Exorbitant” malpractice premiums are making it harder for doctors to stay in the business, and hurting taxpayers whose money goes for publicly funded clinics, said William C. Parrish Jr., chief executive officer of the Santa Clara County Medical Association, based in San Jose, California. The group represents 3,600 physicians.

I would love to see some serious research on this issue. I've seen the numbers quoted here as to the results of malpractice suits. As a result, I tend to believe the actual costs are not great, at a macro level. But doctors are gouged by the insurance industry into overpaying for protection. And overtesting.

Just would love to see the data. And can't imagine how it would be collected.



To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (116494)7/25/2009 4:06:43 PM
From: biotech_bull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542557
 
It's amazing how diametrically opposite some of the views of these experts are.

Defensive medicine is a big, really BIG, part of health care costs here - anyone who discounts that is, to put it mildly, either naive or 'a serious economist'.

However, that's not to say tort reform is a magic bullet that's going to make defensive medicine disappear altogether.