SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: saveslivesbyday who wrote (212449)7/25/2009 10:42:08 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Interesting thought, but since O has said hundreds of times, single payor is off the table.



To: saveslivesbyday who wrote (212449)7/25/2009 2:24:54 PM
From: Skeeter BugRespond to of 306849
 
>>because I as President will reject a solution that delivers health care by raising the costs of middle income people who are already struggling.<<

that's a 100% lie.

one of the MAIN POINTS of this program is to over charge the unemployed, underemployed, debt slave youth of this country to subsidize the wealthiest group of america - the elderly.

the poorest generation could easily pay 3x their costs to support the wealthiest generation.

oh, and very few of these retired wealthy people make much regular income that will get taxed to pay for health care. it is all cap gains plus a ton of assets that won't get taxed.

this is a no brainer for the AARP - but it is a second kick to the head of the american youth.



To: saveslivesbyday who wrote (212449)7/25/2009 8:15:40 PM
From: NOWRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
of course he is right, that would be a great political strategy, but it will never happen. why does he waste so much ink describing it? who is his audience?