Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (498489)	7/27/2009 11:37:21 AM
From: d[-_-]b	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575605

What was that pre-election show regarding some reporters being invited to "see" the documents? How could that be if the documents were destroyed? starbulletin.com The state health director said yesterday she has personally seen and verified Sen. Barack Obama's original birth certificate in an effort to address numerous requests for the document. This just feeds the conspiracy fire.

To: bentway who wrote (498489)	7/27/2009 11:39:07 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1575605

that's not a birth certificate. can you read ?

To: bentway who wrote (498489)	7/27/2009 12:02:44 PM
From: jlallen	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575605

Read the line at the bottom of the online document that cites the law making it a legally binding document, An ignorant statement. The document states that it is "prima facie" evidence.....not that it is legal binding. After a prima facie case has been presented in Court, the burden shifts to the other party to refute it. Prima facie evidence raises a presumption which can be overcome with the introduction of other competent evidence. So why don't you read the document and follow you own advice about where to put it, dipshit. J.